You can't answer the "AI share-of-voice" question
Three vendors pitched you AI-search dashboards. Each told a different story. You need ground truth — not a vendor-told narrative.
For content marketers
You shipped 200 articles, hit your traffic numbers, got the promotion. Now your CMO asks "what's our share-of-voice in AI search?" CitationDesk's free format-gap audit shows why articles do or don't get cited — per article, in 90 seconds — and for the weekly tracked number, we point you to the right monitoring tool.
What we hear from content marketers
Three vendors pitched you AI-search dashboards. Each told a different story. You need ground truth — not a vendor-told narrative.
Your "ultimate guide" pages still rank fine on Google but get cited 0 times in 4 LLMs. The traffic loss to AI Overviews is hitting your category — and you're structurally on the wrong side of it.
Your writers optimize for word count + H2 sub-headings + keyword density. None of those translate to citation-fit. Briefs need a new section.
How CitationDesk fits
Ask the four LLMs your top buyer queries and see which articles get cited. For the ones that don't, the free score explains why — per article, with the specific format gap named.
For the articles NOT being cited, the Citation Readiness Score returns a per-article fix list. Update the brief template. Send the list to your editorial team. Measure citation lift over 4-8 weeks.
For a per-query, per-LLM share-of-voice number tracked week over week, pair the free audit with a dedicated monitoring platform — we compare the options honestly.
Worked example
HoldLens is editorial content shipped solo. The five fixes that recovered AI citation are the same five every B2B content team should apply to their top-50 evergreen articles.
Read the case study →Paste any URL. 90 seconds. 0-100 score across five dimensions plus the highest-leverage fix you can ship this week.